English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Indonesian
Russian
Layer-1 blockchains are foundational networks supporting numerous functions instantly on their protocol, whereas Layer-2 blockchains function atop these foundational layers, enhancing scalability and effectivity. Evaluating the utilization and effectivity of EVM-compatible L1 and L2 blockchains and aspect chains helps us higher perceive the market values and the place many of the DeFi exercise comes from.
Dune Analytics information analyzed by starcrypto confirmed Polygon, a Layer-2 sidechain, was the main determine within the DeFi ecosystem, carefully adopted by BNB Chain, an EVM-compatible Layer-1 blockchain.
One of the crucial vital metrics when analyzing L1s and L2s is the day by day fuel utilization—the computational effort required to execute operations on the blockchain. Gasoline charges are paid in native blockchain currencies, and excessive fuel utilization sometimes signifies sturdy community exercise. Notably, when L2 options preserve excessive fuel utilization at low USD prices, it displays an environment friendly scaling resolution that makes transactions reasonably priced with out sacrificing blockchain exercise.
Polygon makes use of a mean of 579.97 billion items of native fuel day by day, with related prices amounting to only $65.48k. This interprets to a meager common of $0.76 in USD per second regardless of processing a excessive quantity of 48.37 transactions per second. Every transaction on Polygon prices about 138,782 fuel items. BNB Mainnet, whereas additionally excessive in transaction quantity, reveals a unique price construction with 454.89 billion items of native fuel used day by day and $1.02 million in day by day USD charges; the price per second soars to $11.81, far surpassing Polygon’s. The upper price per transaction, which averages 108,513 fuel items, displays BNB’s heavier computational demand per transaction, suggesting a extra resource-intensive operation than Polygon.
| Chain | Avg Native Gasoline Used / Day | Avg USD Gasoline Charges / Day | Avg # Txs / Day | Avg Native Gasoline per Tx | Avg Native Gasoline Used / Second | Avg USD Gasoline Charges / Second | Avg # Txs / Second |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polygon Mainnet | 579.97b | $65.48k | 4.18m | 138,782 | 6.71m | $0.76 | 48.37 |
| BNB Mainnet | 454.89b | $1.02m | 4.06m | 108,513 | 5.26m | $11.81 | 47.03 |
| Arbitrum One | 273.96b | $250.05k | 1.14m | 241,207 | 3.17m | $2.89 | 13.15 |
| Base Mainnet | 222.37b | $378.72k | 1.26m | 174,229 | 2.57m | $4.38 | 14.59 |
| OP Mainnet | 213.30b | $160.26k | 490.83k | 429,129 | 2.47m | $1.85 | 5.68 |
| Gnosis Mainnet | 109.77b | $1.05k | 182.58k | 601,244 | 1.27m | $0.01 | 2.11 |
| Ethereum Mainnet | 108.14b | $12.63m | 1.19m | 90,758 | 1.25m | $146.20 | 13.79 |
| Fantom Mainnet | 94.86b | $4.89k | 248.93k | 372,521 | 1.10m | $0.06 | 2.88 |
Arbitrum makes use of 273.96 billion items of fuel day by day, costing customers $250.05k, which breaks right down to $2.89 per second and 241,207 fuel items per transaction, indicating a better price effectivity than BNB however much less so than Polygon. Base Mainnet data comparable developments with 222.37 billion items and day by day charges of $378.72k, leading to a barely greater per-second price of $4.38 and 174,229 items per transaction.
Ethereum operates with the best price impression, utilizing 108.14 billion fuel items day by day, translating right into a hefty $12.63 million in charges. With prices skyrocketing to $146.20 per second, regardless of having a mean of 90,758 fuel items per transaction, it illustrates Ethereum’s sturdy safety and computational breadth and highlights its scalability challenges that L2 networks goal to handle.
Taking a look at transaction metrics, information from April 23 reveals that Polygon led with 4.02 million transactions, adopted by BNB Chain with 3.9 million. These figures present sturdy person engagement and community utility, representing a respective 25.8% and 25.1% share of complete transactions (excluding identified system transactions).
Nevertheless, when inspecting transaction charges, a unique narrative emerges. Regardless of a decrease transaction depend, Ethereum amassed $7.46 million in charges, representing a staggering 83.9% of complete charges collected. This discrepancy means that whereas Ethereum processes fewer transactions, its greater transaction prices replicate its major layer standing and the intensive computational sources required for operations.
In relation to DeFi apps, Polygon once more leads the transaction numbers, with 3.3 million app transactions, displaying it’s a go-to platform for DeFi actions.
BNB Chain noticed 1.22 million transacting addresses, with Polygon barely behind at 1.18 million. These figures, contrasted with Ethereum’s 402.77k, counsel that different EVM-compatible networks have gotten most popular platforms for normal DeFi customers resulting from their decrease price constructions.
Analyzing the efficiency of those blockchains side-by-side reveals a battle between foundational safety and enhanced scalability. Whereas L1 blockchains like Ethereum proceed to safe high-value transactions with substantial charges, scaling options like Polygon seize the majority of day by day transactions and utility interactions, signifying a shift in the direction of extra environment friendly and user-friendly blockchain infrastructures in DeFi.
It’s vital to notice that regardless of being labeled as a Layer-2 blockchain by many, Polygon operates as an L2 sidechain for Ethereum, because it depends by itself set of validators and doesn’t rely on Ethereum for safety. This enables Polygon to assist extra experimental exercise than “true” L2 blockchains with out impacting Ethereum. One other truth price mentioning is that BNB Chain is an EVM-compatible Layer-1 blockchain however has positioned itself in the marketplace not as a competitor to Ethereum, one other L1, however to different L2s.