bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 67,587.11
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,119.70
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 576.76
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.517711
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.998283
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.152445
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.468746
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 179.36
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.69124
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 7.05
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.122153
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 67,587.11
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,119.70
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 576.76
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.517711
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.998283
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.152445
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.468746
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 179.36
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.69124
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 7.05
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.122153
More

    MetaMask Refutes $10.5M Hack Declare Pointing In direction of Pockets Exploit

    Latest News

    • MetaMask’s safety staff is trying into the foundation explanation for the assault 
    • The staff claims that it isn’t a MetaMask-specific exploit.

    Claims {that a} vulnerability within the MetaMask crypto pockets was accountable for a “large pockets draining operation” that stole greater than 5,000 Ether have been refuted by the pockets’s developer.

    Taylor Monahan, the founding father of Ethereum pockets supervisor MyCrypto, printed a collection of updates on April 17 detailing how an unnamed wallet-draining hack has stolen over $10.5 million in cryptocurrencies and NFTs since December 2022. This prompted a tweetstorm from MetaMask on April 18.

    The staff said:

    Exploit Not Restricted to MetaMask Wallets

    The pockets service said the 5,000 ETH was taken “from numerous addresses throughout 11 blockchains,” proving that the assertion that the cash was stolen through MetaMask “is wrong.”

    MetaMask has acknowledged, by a collection of tweets that its safety staff is trying into the foundation explanation for the assault and “working with others throughout the Web3 pockets area.”

    Furthermore, Monahan mentioned within the put up on the vulnerability that “nobody is aware of how” the big assault was carried out, however that her “greatest guess” was that a big amount of historic information was gathered and exploited to steal the cash.

    See also  Sushi’s head chef addresses group considerations amid SEC subpoena

    At first, she mentioned the attacker was using MetaMask to steal from long-time customers and employees. Later, Monahan clarified that the vulnerability isn’t restricted to MetaMask and that “customers of all wallets, even these created on a {hardware} pockets”, have been affected.

    DeFi Protocol SafeMoon Hacker Agrees to Return 80% of Stolen Funds

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Hot Topics

    Related Articles