English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Indonesian
Russian
- Polygon captures as much as 44.1% of votes in a latest Ethereum layer two scaling options ballot.
- Arbitrum intently trails behind, with 30.8% voting it as their alternative.
- Optimism (OP) lags considerably within the ballot outcomes, with solely 9.9% of votes.
In a latest ballot accumulating group suggestions on their high most popular Ethereum layer two scaling options, Polygon has emerged because the possible possibility amongst cryptocurrency fans. The ballot was performed by Crypto analyst “Coin Bureau” on X.
Coin Bureau requested the crypto group to choose their favourite Ethereum layer two amongst a listing of 4 choices containing Arbitrum (ARB), Optimism (OP), Polygon (MATIC), and Immutable (IMX).
The ballot ended, attracting 9,306 respondents. Polygon triumphed with a detailed margin towards the primary runner-up, Arbitrum. Particularly, 44.1% of the respondents expressed that Polygon was their favourite scaling resolution for Ethereum. Arbitrum, the second most most popular possibility, garnered 30.8% of the votes.
Immutable acquired half the variety of votes in comparison with Arbitrum, with 15.2% of respondents expressing their desire for it. Optimism trailed additional behind, with solely 9.9% of respondents indicating their favor towards it.
A respondent supplied further context for his or her vote, affirming that Polygon’s proof-of-stake (POS) and zero-knowledge know-how constituted components that made Polygon their most popular possibility for scaling options. They ranked Arbitrum as their second alternative, highlighting that Immutable is extra application-specific.
In the meantime, this commenter expressed reservations about Optimistic rollups, contemplating them inferior to ZK know-how, and indicated they’d not guess on Optimism for the long run.
Alternatively, members of the Shiba Inu group flooded the remark part, advocating for Shibarium as their most popular Ethereum layer two resolution.
Disclaimer: The data offered on this article is for informational and academic functions solely. The article doesn’t represent monetary recommendation or recommendation of any variety. Coin Version shouldn’t be answerable for any losses incurred on account of the utilization of content material, merchandise, or providers talked about. Readers are suggested to train warning earlier than taking any motion associated to the corporate.