bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 90,871.35
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,119.33
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 627.17
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.09
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.995835
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.36866
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.719463
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 239.00
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.412628
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 5.69
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.20273
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 90,871.35
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,119.33
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 627.17
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 1.09
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.995835
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.36866
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.719463
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 239.00
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.412628
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 5.69
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.20273
More

    NBA Star Shaquille O’Neal Holed up at Dwelling to Keep away from FTX-Associated Lawsuit

    Latest News

    NBA star Shaquille O’Neal has been hiding out at residence to keep away from a class-action lawsuit filed by buyers in November, in response to his legal professionals.

    The lawsuit was filed in opposition to him and a former govt of cryptocurrency trade FTX with a view to promote the trade’s development.

    Attorneys for the plaintiffs, David Boyce and Adam Moskowitz, wrote in an e mail to the defendants Tuesday that they made strenuous efforts to serve the lawsuit on their behalf, however solely O’Neill selected to evade service in help of the Litigation. Prolonging authorized proceedings or evading duty for expenses.

    O’Neill had allegedly been hiding out at residence for the previous month when the subpoena confirmed up at his door with courtroom paperwork, in response to the legal professional. Additionally they declare to have contacted the final recognized litigant for O’Neill with out success.

    The lawsuit accuses O’Neill and FTX of violating securities legal guidelines by selling the trade with out disclosing endorsement charges.

    FTX has declined to touch upon the case, whereas O’Neal’s representatives haven’t responded to requests for remark. The courtroom is anticipated to rule on the plaintiffs’ movement to permit various service on the defendants.

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Hot Topics

    Related Articles