bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 76,440.48
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,920.93
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 593.57
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.546532
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 1.00
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.193151
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.445058
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 198.93
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.386191
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 4.30
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.160985
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 76,440.48
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,920.93
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 593.57
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.546532
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 1.00
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.193151
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.445058
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 198.93
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.386191
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 4.30
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.160985
More

    MetaMask ‘glitch’ prompted opBNB beneficial charges to be too excessive: Report

    Latest News

    A “glitch” in MetaMask that prompted it to overestimate opBNB fuel charges has now been fastened, based on a social media submit from BNB Chain. Many customers pay the default beneficial charge displayed of their wallets, so a misestimation may cause customers to overpay.

    opBNB is an optimistic rollup layer-2 of . It was launched on Sept. 13 and was developed by the workforce that created BNB Chain. In accordance with the workforce, they found lately that “Metamask had set a default minimal advice value for fuel based mostly on the typical of all networks.” This was an affordable coverage for different L2 networks, the workforce stated, but it surely “did not fairly align with opBNB.” The workforce claimed that opBNB charges “could be a lot decrease than different L1 and L2 networks,” making the estimation inaccurate.

    Proceed Studying on Coin Telegraph

    See also  Web3 Swap Debate by Museigen.io, Founders Hub Community and SynergyLabs TH ICP

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Hot Topics

    Related Articles